{"id":1400,"date":"2011-03-20T11:43:33","date_gmt":"2011-03-20T18:43:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/greg.porter.name\/wordpress\/?p=1400"},"modified":"2011-03-24T12:48:54","modified_gmt":"2011-03-24T19:48:54","slug":"data-ontap-8-7-mode-why-not","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/greg.porter.name\/wordpress\/?p=1400","title":{"rendered":"Data ONTAP 8 7-Mode: What is it? Why aren’t you running it?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"netapp\"<\/a>I have used a lot of different storage systems from a lot of different vendors.\u00a0 Typically I prefer fibre channel based storage area networks for their block I\/O and high performance.\u00a0 I never paid much attention to NetApp, since they traditionally did Network Attached Storage (NAS)<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Recently I started working in a NetApp shop, and our filers do a little bit of everything, Fibre Channel Protocol (FCP), iSCSI, and NFS.\u00a0 I’m getting to like my NetApp filers.\u00a0 One feature I particularly like is that all NetApp filers, small or large, run one common operating system, Data ONTAP<\/a>.\u00a0 Unlike most vendors, the NetApp product line is *NOT* cobbled together from various incompatible acquisitions\u00a0 (e.g.\u00a0 Dell is not Clariion, is not EMC…)\u00a0 Once you learn ONTAP, you can work on pretty much anything NetApp.\u00a0 One of the large “hidden” costs of implementing a storage area network (SAN) are the people costs.\u00a0 Specialized SAN equipment takes people with specialized training, and having one common operating system makes for considerable savings.\u00a0 Read on for more on Data ONTAP…<\/p>\n

( Some of these links are from IBM.\u00a0 IBM resells NetApp as “N series”, and IBM often writes better publicly accessible documentation on Data ONTAP than NetApp does.\u00a0 See Data ONTAP Release Model<\/a> and Introduction to Data ONTAP<\/a>.)<\/p>\n

NetApp released Data ONTAP 8.0 in 2009<\/a>.\u00a0 It was more or less a complete rewrite of the Data ONTAP code base plus new features.\u00a0 The compelling reason for customers to go to Data ONTAP 8.0 is that it supports large aggregates.\u00a0 A Data ONTAP “aggregate” is a logical grouping of disks.\u00a0 In Data ONTAP 7G, aggregates are 32 bit, and can only hold 16TB of data.\u00a0 With 1GB and 2GB SATA drives becoming available, being limited to 16TB maximum aggregate size is a serious shortcoming.\u00a0 The usual way of compensating for SATA slowness is “lots of spindles”, i.e. running lots of drives together in one group.\u00a0 Data ONTAP 7G doesn’t allow you to do this with the larger drives.\u00a0 Data ONTAP 8.0 supports 64 bit aggregates of up to 100TB in size.\u00a0 It also supports numerous other features, notably DataMotion<\/a>.\u00a0 DataMotion allows you to move LUNs (block level targets for iSCSI or FCP) between aggregates *WHILE IN USE*<\/strong>.\u00a0 So for customers that need to do some serious housecleaning (moving LUNs around), DataMotion is a significant feature.<\/p>\n

The latest maintenance release of Data ONTAP 8.0 is 8.0.1, which went to general availability (GA) in January 2011.\u00a0 As with most maintenance releases, it was a relatively minor release.\u00a0 It had a number of bug fixes in it, as well as some new features.\u00a0 (Notably it incorporated support for VMware “vStorage API for Array Integration”<\/a> or VAAI.\u00a0 For VMware customers, VAAI offers substantial advantages.\u00a0 VMware ESX hosts can offload storage operations to their arrays, saving ESX host cycles.\u00a0 Operations like clone or copy can be 10X faster.)<\/p>\n

In my recent Data ONTAP class<\/a> there were 14 students.\u00a0 Almost all of them were running some version of 8.\u00a0 The ones that weren’t were getting ready to.\u00a0 Official NetApp training curriculum, course materials and offerings from authorized training providers are only available for Data ONTAP 8.\u00a0 They no longer offer books or training on Data ONTAP 7G.\u00a0 Data ONTAP 8.0 will be the basis of future versions of ONTAP that offer significant new features.\u00a0 Make plans to update now.<\/p>\n

The next major release of Data ONTAP 8 is 8.1.\u00a0 We should see the first release candidate in the next few months.\u00a0 My instructor said she was told it would be GA by the end of the year.<\/p>\n

What’s the term “7-Mode” mean, anyway?<\/strong>
\nNetApp has 2 basic variants of its filer operating system.\u00a0\u00a0 For Data ONTAP 7, the original Data ONTAP is called “G” as in “Data ONTAP 7G”.\u00a0 For ONTAP 8, they say “7-Mode” as in “Data ONTAP 8.0 7-Mode”.\u00a0 7G or 8 7-Mode are the same thing, the original Data ONTAP for filers. In addition, the NetApp sales people have figured out that customers are reluctant to upgrade to 8, so they coined the term “7-Mode” to make it sound friendlier somehow.<\/p>\n

In 2003, NetApp acquired Spinnaker Networks<\/a>, who made appliances running SpinFS, a distributed file system.\u00a0\u00a0 Subsequently, NetApp made separate clustered versions of Data ONTAP that were based on SpinFS and had little to do with “real” Data ONTAP.\u00a0 These include Data ONTAP 7GX (“X” = cluster) and Data ONTAP 8 cluster-mode.\u00a0 Cluster-mode only supports NAS protocols (NFS, CIFS), it doesn’t do block level protocols (iSCSI, FCP).\u00a0 People running Cluster-Mode are typically doing lots of file shares or home directories across geographically dispersed filers., and is commonly used in high performance computing clusters.<\/p>\n

Customers have to decide at install time if they are going to run 7-mode or cluster-mode.\u00a0 They are 2 completely different install images.\u00a0 There is no “converting” between 7-mode and cluster-mode, you have to do a complete re-install and copy all data.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I have used a lot of different storage systems from a lot of different vendors.\u00a0 Typically I prefer fibre channel based storage area networks for their block I\/O and high performance.\u00a0 I never paid much attention to NetApp, since they… Continue Reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-content"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/greg.porter.name\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/greg.porter.name\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/greg.porter.name\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greg.porter.name\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greg.porter.name\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1400"}],"version-history":[{"count":24,"href":"https:\/\/greg.porter.name\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1400\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1410,"href":"https:\/\/greg.porter.name\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1400\/revisions\/1410"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/greg.porter.name\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greg.porter.name\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greg.porter.name\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}